Comments on: Using the WebSphere pluggable client inside WebLogic Server

By: Paco G

Paco G — Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:24:28 +0000

Please, as Marcus said, can you upload the sources?
The download zip only has the .class ones.

Thanks in advance.

Paco García

By: Marcus

Marcus — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:29:05 +0000

I’ve just downloaded your project. When you said “You may download the complete source code: was-client-inside-wls-updated-src”, do you mean the complete byte code? I’m not seeing any .java files here. There are only .class files.
Can you send me a copy? I also don’t have ibmext.jar and properties.jar. Can you send me these jar as well?

thanks and best regards.

By: Paul René Jørgensen

Paul René Jørgensen — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:49:40 +0000

@Asgeir S. Nilsen
Your reply forced me to rethink the situation, and yes, there is a better way of doing this. Since both entry and exit point to the transaction leading to the IBM RMI-implementation is through the InvocationHandler I could create a singleton registering / unregistering threads that are bound to use the IBM-implementation. And the UtilDelegateInvocationHandler could likewise check this singleton to see if the current Thread was registered and then choose the IBM implementation.

Thank you for challenging my solution and force me come up with something even better.

By: Asgeir S. Nilsen

Asgeir S. Nilsen — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:36:20 +0000

I see your useIBM() method creates an exception and inspects the stack trace to decide whether IBM or BEA is using it. Creating stack traces are costly on 1.4 JVMs. Does there exist other options for achieving the same result?

By: Hans-Jacob Melby

Hans-Jacob Melby — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:49:08 +0000

How cool is that!
Source please ?

By: Pal

Pal — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:24:08 +0000

Hahahaha. Fanbloodytastic